M. H., it's probably only really useful to grab the images from a specific website - for example if you are a web developer, and you want to grab all the images from the current version of the website (without downloading the entire site via FTP etc).

As J. Barry noted, it doesn't show previews or info like file size, image size, etc, so probably not overly useful when searching for images.

CheeseBag  –  Last year  –  Комментарий оказался полезным? да | нет (+9)

Перевести

In response to [ M. H. ] who asked, "... Can anyone tell me a use case for this? ..."

Aside from vanity searches, patent, trademark, copyright searches, comparison of search engines, and so on, to see what's out there, this program can provide an automated basic exhaustive list to explore and archive, "see, we looked", and someone developing a marketing name for their new product might stumble upon someone already using the name in a way that might be competitive or require working around or even be worthy of a lawsuit if there is infringement.

As others have noted, this is not sophisticated in that it does not participate interactively in interpreting and refining the process or results, just leaving us with lists of links and downloaded images without direct reference where they came from.

But it's a starting point.

Alternatives are GrabASite and equivalents, I suppose, print-screening with Picasa turned on to grab URL images with web page content images, those at least provide visual documentation, and a human can take it from there.

Any other thoughts from fellow GOTD users?
.

Peter Blaise  –  Last year  –  Комментарий оказался полезным? да | нет (+9)

Перевести