Well, it downloads OK, and despite taking an age to install, it does get there in the end.

In operation, it crawls the site fairly quickly, and the HTML* validation is fairly good. It is more picky than the W3C checker, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.

However, the CSS validation is a bit rubbish. It complains "The construction is followed by an unexpected character." whenever it finds a /* css comment */ and it puts out "A '}' character expected." errors for no apparent reason. I can't see why, and nor can the W3C CSS validator.

Its usability is poor. To generate a report after checking a site requires no less than seven mouse clicks.

Overall, it is almost worth having for free. But it needs the CSS validation bugs fixed or it will send users on wildgoose chases.

*I only tested with HTML5

Iain  –  9 years ago  –  Комментарий оказался полезным? да | нет (+45)

Перевести

Found I can view report just not save it yet. All files received code 200 OK, Says in various red, black & green text there are 6 warnings and 100+ markup errors, but offers no insight into the nature or which lines are of concern. Not very helpful or promising so far.

BobbyA  –  9 years ago  –  Комментарий оказался полезным? да | нет (+6)

Перевести